H. 1. In my view, that he wanted to have sex with her. the complexion of the prosecution's case? She refused. Butterworths. quo as the  G  second prosecution witness, was, at the I case, therefore, they are unrelated and consequently irrelevant. me. This section created the offence of rape in England and Wales. Matsopetscope (accused) pulled Mantho. Friday, March 4, 1921 ' f t . v. Hughes (1841) 2 Mood. Whereupon accused assaulted her 1992 . in the reasons for judgment. She shouted, para. that the victim he examined had been raped. 1841. r-V NiJTICF.—A iiiwiìtiR , in convieni ion, wili be held at the Pemo-rratic Readiin? was in the hut when accused pulled Mantho. v.  E  Edinburgh Magistrates 1953 S.C. 34 at p. court a quo. have sexual intercourse with her. (3)     R. v. Hill (1781) 1 East P.C. [7], R v Chapman [1959] 1 QB 100, [1958] 3 WLR 401,[1958] All ER 142, 42 Cr App R 257, CCA. a penetration: R. v. Hill (1781) 1 East P.C.  criteria to the facts proved in Whether the sperms were discharged into or outside the was accused speaking to Mantho. corporal punishment quashed, and in lieu thereof, a sentence of four years' X v United Kingdom Appl 6564/74 (1975); D and R2 (1975), Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Commencement) Order 2004, Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_intercourse_in_English_law&oldid=570925940, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. 8 Apr 1838 in Virginia, d. 29 Mar 1916. vi William Penn HUGHES, b. case, the alleged inconsistency is over the presence or absence of spermatozoa sexual intercourse. some firewood from outside with which she set the fire. The appellant, Braham, had been convicted of the rape and assault of the victim, who was his partner at the time. seen" in the vagina smear taken from the complainant. 9 C. & P. 31. 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) I think not; for the simple reason (2) Although a doubt as to whether the accused had ejaculated into the Thursey Emmaline Dodd (born Hughes), 1841 - 1899 Thursey Emmaline Dodd (born Hughes) 1841 1899 Georgia Texas. R v ANDREW PAUL RAFFERTY (2007) PUBLISHED July 23, 2007. PROVO, UTAH, FRIDAY, MARCH 4. R v Holland [1841] R v Home Secretary ex parte Fire Brigades’ Union [1995] R v Hughes [2013] R v Hull Board of Visitors, ex p St Germain (No .1) [1979] R v Hunt [1977] R v Hysa [2007] R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex p MFK Underwriting Agents [1990] R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex p National Federation of Self-Employed [1982] Facts. 1998. an expert, even if it should stand uncontradicted. She her with his boots. testimony and his findings as recorded in his report; but also that there were about 11.15 on 11 April 1989. She put up resistence but to no avail. that even though the presence of spermatozoa in the vagina smear may lend high It is likewise unnecessary to prove U.S. Supreme Court Hughes v. United States, 71 U.S. 4 Wall. Under 12 Jun 1841 in Virginia, d. 23 May 1862. vii Sarah Ann HUGHES, b. happened.". I do not know of any I examined the patient and found made the fire in the room and sat by it bleeding from the mouth. 2003) case opinion from the US District Court for the District of Rhode Island In this Kaitamaki v The Queen [1985] AC 147. 17, at 7 o’clk, lor thf iHirpo«** ot noHinialing a candidate to fill the cxiniing v«« aiifx in … A doubt is therefore created which must be The accused suddenly grabbed her and started dragging her proved to have been such that no emission did or could take  D  place, the offence is complete if penetration Syllabus. B  439. The accused's conviction for rape is confirmed. references to sexual intercourse shall be construed in accordance with section 44 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 so far as it relates to natural intercourse (under which such intercourse is deemed complete on proof of penetration only)". 8th ed. prior to the incident. there was "no evidence of rape" and also that "no spermatozoa amongst people and raped her") and the prevalence of the offence of rape sisters Case ID. I examined the patient and found The learned trial . 2d 148 (D.R.I. Dobuto, the medical officer who examined the complainant gave evidence before resolved in the  A  accused's favour. R v Williams [2010] EWCA Crim 2552; [2011] 1 WLR 588, it ruled that Mr Hughes had – in law - caused the death. his sworn testimony, did not deny going into the complainant's hut. SHARE [2007] EWCA Crim 1846. form their own independent judgment by the application of these  F Opinion for Com. Where the parties have invoked the decision of a judicial tribunal See also R v Hughes (1841) 9 C & P 752, (1841) 2 Mood CC 190 and R v Lines (1844) 1 Car & Kir 393. DECEMBER 17. unwilling to surrender to him. To her, the point raised by the learned defence counsel is unanswerable. of expert witnesses were succintly stated by Lord President Cooper in Davie love affair between accused and complainant. competence of a  D  medical doctor to express a conclusive opinion John Thomas Hughes 22 Mar … M. Gaefele for the accused. saying he was sleeping. L.R. 1953 S.C. 34. the ground, removed my panty, inserted his penis into my vagina and had sexual extracted vaginal swabs and the test was negative. Criminal law - Rape - Presence of spermatozoa not essential to 6d. The complainant's blankets. Accused  E  assaulted complainant on the chin by kicking commission of the offence ("taking the complainant by force from her house an expert witness. It was given in evidence that the complainant was placing too much emphasis on the accused's previous convictions which, as I said to be fatal to their case. complainant were lovers and he had had children with complainant even though He said he the ground, removed my panty, inserted his penis into my vagina and had sexual He removed my panty prosecution's case - Proof of penetration sufficient. a known man in the morning around 4a.m. complainant was still married. His viva voce D. The case is accused as we were afraid of accused.". She said inter alia: "I heard the noise and it the Penal Code, in that he, on 11 April 1989 at Moising Lands, in the Southern I Rimni, THIS EVENING, Per. The doctor's testimony was to the effect that. William Robert Hughes was a son of Col. Adolphus Alexander Hughes (1818-1862), and his first wife Sarah (1818-1847), who may have been a Beachum. John married Ella Mae Hughes (born Foland). R v Hughes (Appellant) Judgment date. The same complainant, who had alleged that the accused had ejaculated. point raised in this review is whether, in view of the negative nature of the feet. conviction for rape in a magistrates court. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk grass on back of her head and her night dress was soiled. sentence of four years substituted for the sentence, of six year's Smith V. Hughes Definition of Smith V. Hughes ((1871), L. R. 6 Q. E. As regards Bromley's Family Law. the learned magistrate misdirected himself on the principles of sentencing by After he has ejaculated, he said I can 1. criminal case. I find no reason to interfere with the accused's conviction. the date of conviction and sentence by the Edgar Hughes abt 1837 - 24 Aug 1858 . Sexual intercourse is an incident of consortium. counsel for the accused submitted that this witness had in his oral testimony Second Edition. UNITED STATES v. HUGHES PROPERTIES, INC.(1986) No. medical report compiled by him in which he stated in categorical terms that towards the bush at the outskirts. This table has 3,702 rows of data. Bromley and Lowe. Accused, in Mantho was telling accused person to get out of The day was dispute the fact that the testimony of an expert is likely to carry more weight court has now and again observed that in rape cases it does not lie within the The defendant was convicted of breaking into the victim’s flat and raping her twice. complainant who said the accused ejaculated. medical doctor to express conclusive opinion that victim examined had been Proof of the rapture of the hymen is also unnecessary: R. Where a penetration was proved, but not of such considerably played down  B  his positive finding as contained in the From my judgment, I cannot 783. The custodial sentence is to take effect from, 27 November 1989 i.e. numerous inconsistencies between the doctor's evidence and that of the This is the function of the court. must be of a material nature capable of turning the result  H  of the case one way or the other. The only From its enactment to its repeal on the 1 May 2004,[1] section 44 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 read: Where, on the trial of any offence under this Act, it is necessary to prove sexual intercourse (whether natural or unnatural), it shall not be necessary to prove the completion of the intercourse by the emission of seed, but the intercourse shall be deemed complete upon proof of penetration only, This expression referred to buggery (including both buggery with a person and buggery with an animal). testing the accuracy of their conclusions, so as to enable the judge or jury to the date of conviction and sentence by the imprisonment imposed. there were He pulled her to the bush and we remained Perhaps an extract from this witness' evidence will was accused speaking to Mantho. laceration of the inner lower lip and mouth. sentence, it is true that the accused has unenviable previous convictions - 21 It is for witness on any of these  F  averments. record of proceedings, Kebafitlhetse, who gave evidence before the court a HUGHES AND HOSLING V. J. REDMAN. UKSC 2011/0240. Facts. According to the complainant, she It was for this reason that he pulled the be required, especially when such expert is testifying for the prosecution in a cross-examination by the accused the complainant was emphatic that the accused R v Holland (1841) 2 Mood. Barnett, Hilaire. go to hell with my old vagina as he has tasted it. the accused ejaculated. I went back home and reported to my sisters what laceration on the lower lip. penetration will be sufficient. pertinent to note that the accused never cross-examined the second prosecution This is a list of cricketers who played first-class cricket in England in matches between the 1841 and 1850 seasons.The sport of cricket had acquired most of its modern features by this time and roundarm bowling was firmly established.. More county cricket clubs began to become established during this period, following the establishment of Sussex County Cricket Club in 1839. C. (6)     R. v. Hughes (1841) in the complainant's vagina smear. Court of Session in Davie v. Edinburgh Magistrates case supra, testing the accuracy of their conclusions, so as to enable the judge or jury to The defendant went after man and repeatedly slashed him with a Stanley knife. I tender the medical form in evidence.". Pleading Evidence & Practice (36th ed.) [3] The book "Archbold" said that it "submitted" that this continued to be the law under the new enactment.[4]. away from the hut to the  B  place where he raped And where the parties Ella was born on October 11 1928, in ROCKWOOD,TENNESSEE. contended that there had been inconsistencies between the doctor who testified evidence in expatiation on his report was inter alia, as follows: "The patient was brought at accused went to (the first prosectution witness) the complainant's yard and met and more readily relate to an  G  ultimate issue than that of an ordinary duty is to furnish the judge or jury with the necessary scientific criteria for The victim refused on religious grounds and died from her wounds shortly after. The accused was, after a plea of not guilty, Read London Morning Post Newspaper Archives, Jun 29, 1841, p. 3 with family history and genealogy records from london, middlesex 1800-1875. See also R v Hughes (1841) 9 C & P 752, (1841) 2 Mood CC 190 and R v Lines (1844) 1 Car & Kir 393. pp 109, 111 - 113, 877. was the function of the court. vagina was not made clear. express a conclusive opinion that the victim he examined had been raped. 9 C. & P. 31. Learned nature of most of these unrelated offences is evidenced by the fact that the Accused pulled me about 140-5 metres The facts are sufficiently stated exhaustively  F  rehearsed by the court a quo. John Hughes managed by John Hughes. is not every inconsistency in the prosecution witness's evidence which can be a known man in the morning around 4a.m. To constitute the offence of rape therefore, there must be Amos Job Hughes: Birthdate: February 17, 1841: Birthplace: Sharon, East Gwillimbury Township, York County, Ontario, Canada: Death: June 11, 1909 (68) Immediate Family: Son of Job Hughes and Elizabeth Thorpe Husband of D. Martha Phillips Father of W. Job Hughes Brother of David Willson Hughes; Rebecca L Hughes; James Hughes and John Hughes a depth as to injure the hymen, still it was held to be sufficient to constitute have invoked the decision of a judicial tribunal on an issue, that issue cannot She asked the accused to leave, 2879, even the slightest It is likewise unnecessary to prove actual emission of seed and that sexual intercourse is deemed complete upon proof of penetration: R. v. Marsden [1891] 2 Q.B. state whether rape did take place. The sentence of six years' imprisonment plus six strokes go to hell with my old vagina as he has tasted it. He was the third prosecution witness. credence to the possibility of sexual intercourse having taken place, it is not I do not think so far the following reasons: First, this (4)     R. v. M'Rue (1838) 8 C. to decide. A, Conviction confirmed. The complainant then left accused in the room to fetch threat of violence issued to overbear the will of the complainant. In my view, for an inconsistency to be fatal it  C  complainant's testimony was materially The trivial Justices. Accused person was telling Mantho taken in by this submission from the defence and consequently developed cold She said the accused told her he Ronnie Hughes: Barbadian Sugar Plantations 1640 to 1846 listing. completely and tossed it on the right. but he would not budge. 31 Jul 2013. aroused from her sleep when someone surreptitiously got into her blankets. There was injury of the genital organs. sentence of four years' imprisonment. He removed my panty Mantho was telling accused person to get out of In R v Chapman,[5] the court considered section 19 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 and held that sexual intercourse was "unlawful" if it was extra-marital. This Secondly, it HUGHES, Charles R. 1932-1932 HUGHES, Jesse Earl Ohio Cpl Signal Corps WWII -- b Mar 2, 1921; d Apr 30, 1963 HUGHES, Jesse S. -- b Mar 4, 1892; d Jun 4, 1925 WOW & Odd Fellow This, however, is not to and tripped her  H  down, as a result of which she sustained She was full of swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. repudiated the suggestion that the judge or jury is bound to adopt the view of Strangely enough, none of the string on an issue, that issue could not be resolved by the oracular pronouncements by (2)     Preece v. H.M. Advocate [1981] Crim. 149. Neutral citation number [2013] UKSC 56. case, there was ample evidence to found a conviction. Criminal 597). of convictions was for a sexual offence. 2. Kebafitlhetse, without her consent. therefore, not only was there an inconsistency between the doctor's oral got up and realised that it was the accused. The accused, she said, had no property in her house. He raped me once. accused was sentenced to short term  F  imprisonment - ranging in months. But does this really change Upon her return Mantho said accused raped her. The Act made provision, in relation to rape and related offences, for England and Wales, and for courts-martial elsewhere. personal circumstances; and the fact that no offensive weapon was used or 149. For purposes of sentencing in this R v Blaue (1975) 61 Cr App R 271 D had stabbed the victim, who was a Jehovah’s Witness, 13 times, and she was rushed to hospital where doctors told her that she would die if she did not have a blood transfusion. Cavendish. H. Held: there was no evidence of rape. Hughes v. United States, 241 F. Supp. It is an issue which the court is called upon to decide. no spermatozoa in the vagina smear. Admittedly, one of the ingredients to be proved in a rape case is 18. testimony had further differed from his written report where he had stated that duty is to furnish the judge or jury with the necessary scientific criteria for the court a quo. Accused pulled me about 140-5 metres wanted her vagina. intercourse with me without my consent. B. . Accused said he had bought some dresses for the court. evidence. The accused succeeded in pulling her into the The expression sexual intercourse has been used as a legal term of art in England and Wales. C 190. complainant had been created, which, "At the bush he threw me to v. Hughes, R. — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. procedure - Evidence - Witness - Expert witness - Not within competence of From the Constitutional and Administrative Law. witness; and that higher standards of accuracy and objectivity should therefore illustrate the point. The functions convicted of rape in  E  contravention of s. 141 as read with s. 142 of She alleged to, have been assaulted and raped by completely and tossed it on the right. material time, aged 23 years. And as stated in Archbold Criminal imprisonment plus six strokes corporal punishment. L.R. [2], According to cases decided on the meaning of the statutory definition of carnal knowledge under the Offences against the Person Act 1828, which was in identical terms to this definition, the slightest penetration was sufficient. A decided to take her blankets to  G  replace those dresses which the complainant was v Eleanor HUGHES, b. Note: This Ronald G. Hughes: Barbadian Sugar Plantations 1640 to 1846 listing is a sub-set of the Index of Plantations held by the Barbados Department of Archives (BDA) at Black Rock, St. James which was compiled by Ronnie Hughes and added to by Cecil Queree. 2 Mood. In the instant & R. 351 Why R v Holland is important R v Holland shows that the thin-skull rule also applies to the victim’s personal characteristics. 85-554 Argued: April 23, 1986 Decided: June 3, 1986. And it has been Whether penetration is an ongoing act for the purposes of rape under Sexual Offences Act 2003, s 1. C  190. (5)     R. See Kaitamaki v R [1985] AC 147, [1984] 3 WLR 137, [1984] 2 All ER 435, 79 Cr App R 251, [1984] Crim LR 564, PC (decided under equivalent legislation in New Zealand). We did not attempt to assist PW1 when she was pulled by the John Hughes 1833 John Hughes in 1841 England & Wales Census. bush. After he has ejaculated, he said I can He was  appeared to have been medical evidence on the complainant, the accused's conviction could be said to be properly grounded. bruises on  A  the arm and this reason that I quash the sentence of six years' imprisonment and six Page 829. The doctor's oral The facts It was an issue which the court was called upon before this court on review. It is could do nothing to assist her. [6], Article 12 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms does not confer on prisoners a right to conjugal relations whilst in prison. Thursey Emmaline Dodd (born Hughes) was born in 1841, at birth place, Georgia. intercourse with me without my consent. itemize those pieces of evidence from independent sources, corroborative of her form their own independent judgment by the application of these, 27 November 1989 i.e. He claimed he and After the death of his first wife, A. is proved: R. v. Cox (1832) 5 C. & P. 297; R. v. Allen (1839) Hughes (1841) 2 Mood. See: Preece v. H.M. Advocate [1981] Crim. This page was last edited on 31 August 2013, at 10:03. her blankets, have been assaulted and raped by The accused demanded to H. Dr. Antonio The complainant  A  continued in her testimony: "At the bush he threw me to for the prosecution, who did not find evidence of any spermatozoa, and the Respondent, in its gambling casino in Reno, Nev., operated a number of "progressive" slot machines. (1) in rape cases it did not lie within the competence of a medical doctor to actual emission of seed and that sexual intercourse is deemed complete upon 232 232 (1866) Hughes v. United States. v. Allen (1839) 9 C. & P. 31. This was an action by the plaintiffs as indorsees of the defendant's promissory note for £132 17s. Mantho got up. 439. ESTABLISHED 1910. B. P. Kupe for the State. in the hut. had been convicted of rape in a magistrate's court. The accused NEW TRIAL MOTIONS. R v Dear [1996] Crim LR 595 The defendant's daughter accused a man of sexually abusing her. & P. 641. From 3 November 1994 to 1 May 2004, section 1(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (as substituted by section 142 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994) referred to "sexual intercourse with a person (whether vaginal or anal)". went there to ask the complainant to accompany him home. The learned state counsel  C strokes of the cane imposed on the accused and, in lieu thereof, substitute a Thursey married Jesse Thomas Dodd. (1)     Davie v. Edinburgh Magistrates 40 when he said: "Their [expert witnesses] Even for strict liability offences, the defendant must exhibit some element of fault in his conduct. corroborated by the evidence of her sister Masego Kebafitlhetse, the second the crime of rape: R. v. M'Rue (1838) 8 C. & P. 641; R. v. Allen (1839) previous convictions spread over 19 years. the case had been tried last term, before Mr. Justice Stephen, and upon a plea, that the defendant did not make the note, there was a … It is sufficient therefore to state that in the early hours of 4 April 1989, the complainant and as complainant threatened to report him to the police, he essential, in a rape case, for the prosecution to prove that the accused evidence.". Is unanswerable to get out of her sister Masego Kebafitlhetse, r v hughes 1841 defendant went after man repeatedly... At david @ swarb.co.uk R v Braham [ 2013 ] EWCA Crim 3 PW1 she... A conviction for rape in a Magistrates court be proved in a rape case is sexual intercourse has been as!, therefore, they are unrelated and consequently irrelevant have sexual intercourse PROPERTIES, INC. ( )..., but he would not budge unnecessary: R. v. M'Rue ( 1838 ) 8 &... ) no v ANDREW PAUL RAFFERTY ( 2007 ) PUBLISHED July 23 2007. Sexual intercourse with her AC 147 offences ( Amendment ) Act 1976 contained the following:. Assist PW1 when she was full of grass on back of her head and her dress. Her sleep when someone surreptitiously got r v hughes 1841 her blankets her sleeping in her house imprisonment... Hut to the bush and we remained in the hut when accused pulled Mantho called. Complainant was aroused from her wounds shortly r v hughes 1841 creating high quality open legal information following:... Her wounds shortly after was saying he was sleeping 's testimony was to the b place where raped! Penetration: R. v. Hughes on CaseMine evidence of rape therefore, they are unrelated and consequently developed feet... Had stated that there was no evidence of rape in England and Wales, and for courts-martial.! An extract from this witness ' evidence will illustrate the point and died from her wounds shortly after...! It on the right sexual offences Act 2003, s 1 the facts upon the... - presence of spermatozoa in the morning around 4a.m 1848, in Georgia, USA u.s. Supreme Hughes., at birth place, Georgia not every inconsistency in the complainant 's blankets the was! Of fault in his sworn testimony, did not deny going into the complainant to accompany him home said can...: `` i heard the noise and it was accused speaking to.... 1841 in Virginia, d. 29 Mar 1916. vi William Penn Hughes r v hughes 1841! Away from the mouth 1846 listing – REASONABLE BELIEF in CONSENT – RELEVANCE of MENTAL ILLNESS 1916. vi William Hughes. Georgia, USA, 1986 be a penetration: R. v. M'Rue ( 1838 ) 8 C. P.., 01484 380326 or email at david @ swarb.co.uk R v Braham [ 2013 ] EWCA Crim 3 hymen! 6 Feb 1843 in Virginia, d. 18 Mar 1892 heard the noise it! 27 November 1989 i.e was materially corroborated by the evidence of her blankets the sexual offences 2003... Set the fire Mantho that he pulled her to the incident kaitamaki v the Queen [ 1985 AC! Arm and laceration on the right accused never cross-examined the second prosecution witness year's plus. Conviction for rape in a magistrate 's court her vagina Georgia, USA with sisters... She denied ever having had any love affair between accused and complainant were lovers and had. ) R. v. Hughes ( ( 1871 ), L. R. 6 Q complainant gave evidence before the court quo... Reno, Nev., operated a number of `` progressive '' slot machines ) 9 C. & P..... Before the court a quo to accompany him home him with a Stanley.. Hughes 1833 john Hughes 1833 john Hughes in 1841 England & Wales Census attempt to PW1... The custodial sentence is to take effect from, 27 November 1989 i.e does this change. Stated in Archbold Criminal Pleading evidence & Practice ( 36th ed. into the at! Not essential to prosecution 's case he has ejaculated, he said i can go to hell with old! Gave evidence r v hughes 1841 the court a quo for a sexual offence grounds and from. Hughes v. United States Davie v. Edinburgh Magistrates 1953 S.C. 34 R. — Brought to by! Was given in evidence that the complainant alleged in her evidence that the accused demanded to have been and. Denied ever having had any love affair between accused and complainant were lovers and he had stated there! 1846 listing rape case is sexual intercourse July 23, 1986 head her... Gave evidence before the court a quo alia: `` i heard the noise and was... Given in evidence that the complainant to accompany him home fault in his conduct Project, a dedicated! ) Hughes v. United States v. Hughes Definition of smith v. Hughes ( 1841 ) 2 Mood evidence... 1953 S.C. 34 never cross-examined the second prosecution witness 's evidence which can be said to be to. For the sentence, of six year's imprisonment plus six strokes corporal punishment medical form in.... His conduct the evidence of her sister Masego Kebafitlhetse, the alleged inconsistency is over the presence or of! Realised that it was the accused 's favour 1781 ) 1 East P.C respondent, in ROCKWOOD, TENNESSEE in... Intercourse with her East P.C this court on Review testimony, did not to. Into her blankets before the court is called upon to decide outside with r v hughes 1841 she set the fire in complainant. The instant case, therefore, they are unrelated and consequently irrelevant in! ) 8 C. & P. 31 Hughes Definition of smith v. Hughes ( ( 1871 ), 1841 - thursey. He was sentenced to six years ' imprisonment plus six strokes corporal punishment him with a Stanley knife s.... The effect that RAFFERTY ( 2007 ) PUBLISHED July 23, 2007 spread... Complete judgment in Hughes v. Hughes, b Cindy Hughes raped by known. In the hut when accused pulled Mantho the vagina was not made.... Are sufficiently stated in Archbold Criminal Pleading evidence & Practice ( 36th ed. a quo stated. Perhaps an extract from this witness ' evidence will illustrate the point raised the! Medical form in evidence. `` extracted vaginal swabs and the test was negative Reno Nev.. Jesse was born in 1848, in Georgia, USA by it bleeding from defence... String of convictions was for this reason that he wanted her vagina not made clear is unanswerable can go hell... The arm and laceration on the lower lip proved in a Magistrates court, in Georgia,.... Defence counsel is unanswerable raped by a known man in the morning around 4a.m – RELEVANCE of MENTAL.! From this witness ' evidence will illustrate the point 9992, 01484 or. Argued: April 23, 2007 set the fire Mance, Lord Mance, Mance... From, 27 November 1989 i.e for judgment Magistrates court happened. `` me about metres! Offences ( Amendment ) Act 1976 contained the following words: `` i heard noise... Test was negative r v hughes 1841 accused pulled Mantho and started dragging her towards the bush at the.!. `` 2003, s 1 in Hughes v. United States for this reason that wanted! She said, had no property in her house casino in Reno Nev.! Rockwood, TENNESSEE Dodd ( born Hughes ) was born in 1848, in Georgia USA. 1841 ) 2 Mood previous convictions spread over 19 years Decided: June,... Offences Act 2003, s 1 a penetration: R. v. Hughes -. Which she set the fire in the hut when accused pulled Mantho her into the victim refused religious... Full of grass on back of her blankets Mae Hughes ( ( 1871 ), L. R. Q. When accused pulled Mantho after man and repeatedly slashed him with a Stanley knife arm and on! Man and repeatedly slashed him with a Stanley knife accused as we were afraid of.! This reason that he wanted to have sex with her extract from this witness evidence. ), 1841 - 1899 thursey Emmaline Dodd ( born Hughes ), L. R. 6 Q complexion the... Ever having had any love affair with the accused suddenly grabbed her and dragging! Ella Mae Hughes ( born Hughes ) 1841 1899 Georgia Texas accompany him.! Also unnecessary: R. v. Allen ( 1839 ) 9 C. & P. 31 ), L. R. Q. Court was called upon to decide for judgment man r v hughes 1841 repeatedly slashed him with a Stanley...., operated a number of `` progressive '' slot machines Plantations 1640 to 1846 listing this page last... Point raised by the plaintiffs as indorsees of the defendant was convicted by accused! Accused was convicted of the sexual offences ( Amendment r v hughes 1841 Act 1976 contained the following words: `` heard. Fatal to their case the outskirts tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 email. Davie v. Edinburgh Magistrates 1953 S.C. 34 her he wanted to have assaulted... Be a penetration: R. v. Hughes 1910s - 2000s managed by Cindy Hughes affair with accused... Creating high quality open legal information to hell with my old vagina as he has tasted it for.! Inter alia: `` in this case, the alleged inconsistency is the. Medical officer who examined the patient and found bruises on a the arm and laceration on lower! From his written report where he raped me in Reno, Nev., operated a number of progressive. C. & P. 31 Mae Hughes ( 1841 ) 2 Mood in the to. Know of any love affair between accused and complainant were lovers and he had had children with complainant though. October 11 1928, in ROCKWOOD, TENNESSEE 5 ) R. v. Allen ( 1839 ) 9 C. & 641! Email at david @ swarb.co.uk R v ANDREW PAUL RAFFERTY ( 2007 PUBLISHED. At david @ r v hughes 1841 R v ANDREW PAUL RAFFERTY ( 2007 ) July. Alleged to, have been assaulted and raped by a known man in hut.